Closing date for applications 11.59pm (local time) 14 February 2022 (unless otherwise stipulated)
Call for Applications
The Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) is calling for applications that address research, development & extension (RD&E) priorities nominated by the FRDC’s stakeholders.
The nominated RD&E priorities for investment are outlined below. Applications that address multiple priorities are encouraged where practical.
Applicants may also submit an application that aligns to the FRDC R&D Plan 2020-25 but does not address a nominated priority. Please note, preference may be given to applications that address nominated priorities. If you do wish to submit an application that does not address a nominated priority, it is recommended that you consult with the relevant stakeholder group(s) and expected end users to ensure that research concepts have the support of beneficiaries. Support can be demonstrated through project cash contributions, in-kind contributions, incorporation of end users into the concept and formal letters of support.
All applications MUST be completed via FishNet.
Refer to the FRDC website for more information on the FRDC’s process for Applying for Funding.
Please finalise and submit your application on FishNet so that FRDC receives notification that the application has been submitted. Failure to do so may mean that your application is not submitted and therefore not considered for funding.
If you have any questions or issues with FishNet, please contact the FRDC by phone (02) 6122 2100 or email frdc.programs@frdc.com.au.
Applications must be finalised by 14 February 2022 (unless otherwise stipulated). Applications not submitted by this date may not be accepted unless prior approval for a later submission date is provided by the FRDC.
Each application must clearly outline: how it will meet the relevant identified priority or a specific opportunity if not addressing an identified priority; achievableproject objectives whichrespond to the priority or need; proposed methods to achieve the objectives; project outputs and outcomes including adoption pathways to impact.
A realistic budget that reflects the activity to be undertaken is to be provided along with justification for the budget request. Where appropriate, applicants should demonstrate collaboration with other relevant research providers and end users. Proposed projects should consider past and current research to avoid duplication and build on previous outputs.
Once submitted, the FRDC will assess each application as well as seeking an external review by end users and/or technical experts.
Priority Title |
Nominator(s) |
Research Advisory Committee Post-graduate student funding |
Various RACs |
Developing a Harvest Strategy for species where depletion can no longer be estimated against B0: School Shark as a case study |
Commonwealth RAC |
Assessing the socio-economic value of cultural fishing in Inland Rivers |
New South Wales RAC |
Towards healthy and sustainable freshwater fish populations – assessing genetic health of priority fish species to inform management |
New South Wales RAC |
Enhancing NSW Pipi stocks – feasibility study |
New South Wales RAC |
Integrating recreational fisher experience / satisfaction into decision making |
Northern Territory RAC |
A synthesis of research conducted into the impacts of surface water abstraction on tropical aquatic species |
Northern Territory RAC |
Incorporating Aboriginal perspectives into fishery management review processes, using the Northern Territory Barramundi Fishery as a case study |
Northern Territory RAC |
Addressing uncertainties in the assessment and management of Queensland East Coast Spanish Mackerel |
Queensland RAC |
Commercial and recreational crab fishery – bycatch reduction strategies and escape vents |
Queensland RAC |
Bioeconomic analysis of Queensland’s trawl fishery to inform fishery based maximum economic yield estimates on a regional basis |
Queensland RAC |
Developing stock assessment approaches, harvest strategies and biosecurity for seaweeds in southern Australia |
South Australian RAC |
Developing stock assessment approaches to determine status and set quota for Australian squid fisheries |
South Australian RAC |
Profile of recreational fishers in Tasmania: understanding experiences, behaviours, drivers, communication needs and change factors |
Tasmanian RAC |
Risk profile for paralytic shellfish toxins in Tasmanian Periwinkles |
Tasmanian RAC |
Minor use permit for oxytetracycline in marine and freshwater crustaceans |
Aquatic Animal Health and Biosecurity Research Coordination Program |
Minor use permit for toltrazuril in marine and freshwater finfish |
Aquatic Animal Health and Biosecurity Research Coordination Program |
Current priorities
Title |
Research Advisory Committee Post-graduate student funding |
Need |
Several State and Territory based Research Advisory Committees (RACs) are offering funding for post-graduate (Honours, Masters, and PhD) student projects. This initiative seeks to attract high performing post-graduate students to address a range of priority fisheries projects. Funding is available for the following projects:
|
Deliverables |
The funding available for each student will be $25,000 per year, for up to 3 years, comprised of an annual $10,000 top-up stipend for living expenses and $15,000 for project operating expenses. |
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 14 February 2022 |
End user |
Various – dependent on project |
Jurisdictions |
Various – as named against each project title |
FRDC Outcome(s) |
Outcome 1: Growth for enduring prosperity Outcome 2: Best practices and production systems Enabling Strategy IV: Building capacity and capability |
Other |
The student will gain direct applied research and industry experience by being co-supervised by a scientist from a relevant State and Territory based agency, while researching an industry relevant project and be registered at a university to undertake their post-graduate research. |
Title |
Developing a Harvest Strategy for species where depletion can no longer be estimated against B0: School Shark as a case study |
Need |
The Commonwealth Fisheries Harvest Strategy Policy (CFHSP) provides scope to develop harvest strategies based on alternative assessment methods. In the case of rebuilding species, it requires stock recovery to be measured relative to B0. A number of commercial species in Commonwealth fisheries are managed under rebuilding strategies, (e.g. Blue Warehou, Eastern Gemfish, School Shark, Orange Roughy, Redfish). A new approach(es) is required to accommodate stock assessments that do not provide a measure of stock status relative to B0 while still meeting the intent of the CFHSP. This project will investigate options to develop a harvest strategy for species where depletion can no longer be estimated against B0. School Shark will be used as a case study given that it currently rebuilding, and after two decades of attempting to assess the stock with a method that relied on catch per unit effort (CPUE) as the main index of abundance that stakeholders had little confidence in, a new assessment approach based on the close-kin mark recapture (CKMR) method has been pursued. However, while the use of the CKMR method has been accepted and applied, it does not provide a measure of depletion relative to B0 and consequently, is difficult to demonstrate rebuilding or otherwise of this stock under the current settings. Proposed activities should be informed by the following projects: |
Deliverables |
|
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 14 February 2022 |
End user |
Commonwealth government, potentially some benefits to State/Territory fisheries agencies. Consultation with AFMA and through the relevant advisory bodies (e.g. SharkRAG, SERAG, SESSFRAG, SEMAC) is advised in developing the application. |
Jurisdictions |
Commonwealth – Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery May have flow on benefits to State fisheries agencies |
FRDC Outcome(s) |
Outcome 1: Growth for enduring prosperity Outcome 2: Best Practices and Production Systems |
Other |
This priority has been supported by AFMA's advisory committees (SharkRAG, SESSFRAG, SEMAC) and the AFMA Research Committee (ARC). The ARC noted that this is the highest unfunded priority for the SESSF, given broader implications to future uptake of the CKMR method. |
Title |
Assessing the socio-economic value of cultural fishing in Inland Rivers |
Need |
The cultural value of fishing in inland rivers is unknown in 'Western terms and metrics'; yet is widely acknowledged in Aboriginal communities. Quantifying the socio-economic values of cultural fishing for inland rivers is needed to allow Aboriginal communities to participate more equitably, negotiate for water access in policy instruments (e.g. water sharing plans) and cultural water negotiations and to identify and participate in priority river rehabilitation programs. This will empower and inform Aboriginal communities to allow their voice to be heard and effectively communicated to Fisheries managers to allow cultural values to be recognised and integrated into decision making. |
Deliverables |
Characterise social and economic values and benefits of cultural fishing in Inland Rivers that are meaningful to Traditional Owners focussing on how these are associated with:
Knowledge gained will need to be transferred formally through technical reports, scientific manuscripts and presentations and reporting and communication products tailored to provide information to the communities. |
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 14 February 2022 |
End user |
|
Jurisdictions |
NSW, but will be an important pilot for future national programs |
FRDC Outcome(s) |
Outcome 1: Growth for enduring prosperity Outcome 3: A culture that is inclusive and forward thinking Outcome 4: Fair and secure access to aquatic resources Outcome 5: Community trust, respect, and value |
Other |
This priority is aligned to the FRDC's Indigenous Reference Groups' Research Priorities
This project should look to integrate the tools presented in the Australian Fisheries and Aquaculture Industry 2017/18: Economic Contributions – Practitioner Guideline (FRDC project 2017-210) if undertaking measurement of economic contributions |
Title |
Towards healthy and sustainable freshwater fish populations – assessing genetic health of priority fish species to inform management |
Need |
|
Deliverables |
|
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 14 February 2022 |
End user |
Traditional Owners, public, MDBA, DPIE Water, DPI Fisheries managers, EWAGs, CEWO commonwealth agencies, irrigators, landholders, recreational anglers, and research partners. |
Jurisdictions |
NSW |
FRDC Outcome(s) |
Outcome 1: Growth for enduring prosperity Outcome 2: Best practices and production systems |
Other |
Proposed activities should link to the following projects: |
Title |
Enhancing NSW Pipi stocks – feasibility study |
Need |
|
Deliverables |
|
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 14 February 2022 |
End user |
|
Jurisdictions |
NSW |
FRDC Outcome(s) |
Outcome 1: Growth for enduring prosperity Outcome 2: Best practices and production systems |
Other |
Proposed activities should link to the following project:
|
Title |
Integrating recreational fisher experience / satisfaction into decision making |
Need |
Fisher experience is regarded as an important measure of defining optimal resource use for non-commercial fishing sectors. The lack of recreational fisher experience data has been highlighted at a national level and is the subject of a current FRDC project 2018-161 National Social and Economic Survey of Recreational Fishers 2019. Key fishing stakeholders have identified their desire to include experiential performance indicators into fisheries harvest strategies to optimise the management of available resources in the NT. This is especially important in fishery management areas where management for optimised recreational outcomes have been prioritised. The need to apply and test existing frameworks for measuring fisher experience (or satisfaction) is necessary to validate their utility in the NT and more broadly across jurisdictions. This includes understanding the interaction between fisher satisfaction/experience and catch settings and other administrative arrangements that may influence fisher experience. |
Deliverables |
The proposed activity will comprise three deliverable components:
|
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 14 February 2022 |
End user |
The primary end users are the recreational, tourism and Aboriginal sectors who will benefit by having tailored operational management aimed at achieving the optimal use of available resources, along with fishery managers who will have tools to better track and adjust fishery performance against stated objectives. |
Jurisdictions |
NT (at a minimum), but ideally involve multiple jurisdictions, particularly those across the top end (NT, QLD and WA). |
FRDC Outcome(s) |
Outcome 4: Fair and secure access to aquatic resources |
Other |
Needs to consider findings of FRDC project 2018-161 National Social and Economic Survey of Recreational Fishers 2019. |
Title |
A synthesis of research conducted into the impacts of surface water abstraction on tropical aquatic species |
Need |
The Northern Territory Government is currently developing a policy on surface water abstraction with a view to utilising this resource to support the development of agriculture in the region. A significant amount of scientific literature has identified that the impacts of water abstraction on many tropical fish species could potentially be significant. However, there is a need to synthesise this information to identify key knowledge gaps in relation to water abstraction impacts on tropical aquatic species of commercial, recreational, and traditional importance. Such a synthesis can then be used to guide future research priorities in this area. |
Deliverables |
|
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 14 February 2022 |
End user |
Research providers, fisheries management agencies, commercial, recreational and aboriginal users of the aquatic resource. |
Jurisdictions |
Northern Territory |
FRDC Outcome(s) |
Outcome 1: Growth for enduring prosperity |
Other |
Title |
Incorporating Aboriginal perspectives into fishery management review processes, using the Northern Territory Barramundi Fishery as a case study |
Need |
Aboriginal people are the traditional custodians of Australia's aquatic resources and are an important stakeholder in fisheries management. However, nationally Aboriginal people have been historically underrepresented in fisheries management review processes. There is a lack of data/information on Aboriginal customary fishing and the incorporation of Aboriginal customary, cultural and economic objectives in Harvest Strategies have proven difficult. Fishery Management Advisory Committees (MACs) are often established to advise on fishery review processes and the development of new management arrangements, including Harvest Strategies. MACs are increasingly including Aboriginal representation. However, supporting engagement is often required to record the diversity of Aboriginal perspectives into the review process and support the processes of Fishery MACs and Harvest Strategy development. |
Deliverables |
The project will engage with Traditional Owners to:
|
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 20 DECEMBER 2021 To align the project with the delivery timeline of a review of the NT Barramundi Fishery. |
End user |
|
Jurisdictions |
Northern Territory |
FRDC Outcome(s) |
Outcome 1: Growth for enduring prosperity Outcome 3: A culture that is inclusive and forward thinking Outcome 4: Fair and secure access to aquatic resources Outcome 5: Community trust, respect, and value |
Other |
The project team is expected to create linkages to the planned development of the NSW Aboriginal cultural fishing harvest strategy framework. |
Title |
Addressing uncertainties in the assessment and management of Queensland East Coast Spanish Mackerel |
Need |
|
Deliverables |
|
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 14 February 2022 |
End user |
|
Jurisdictions |
Queensland |
FRDC Outcome(s) |
Outcome 1: Growth for enduring prosperity Outcome 2: Best practices and production systems |
Other |
Title |
Commercial and recreational crab fishery – bycatch reduction strategies and escape vents |
Need |
With the introduction of mandatory escape vents in the commercial mud crab fishery, there are some opportunities to refine their specifications for better commercial and ecological outcomes on a regional basis. Applicants should demonstrate consultation with commercial crab fishers. |
Deliverables |
|
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 14 February 2022 The Harvest Strategy is currently in its first year. To be effective, a shorter term (1 – 1.5 years) project would be appropriate, given the management cycle. |
End user |
Commercial and recreational crab fishers. Management. |
Jurisdictions |
Queensland – appropriate for NSW and NT consideration |
FRDC Outcome(s) |
Outcome 1: Growth for enduring prosperity. Outcome 2: Best practices and production systems. Outcome 4: Fair and secure access to aquatic resources. Outcome 5: Community trust, respect, and value. |
Other |
It is expected that any application would draw on existing technologies such as those developed in the Northern Territory and adapt based on the requirements, such as size of crab, in the Queensland fisheries. |
Title |
Bioeconomic analysis of Queensland's trawl fishery to inform fishery based MEY estimates on a regional basis |
Need |
Queensland's Sustainable Fisheries Strategy objective is to achieve maximum economic yield (MEY), or where there is no MEY – 60% unfished biomass. In some fisheries a target of 60% unfished biomass may overestimate the level required to reach a true MEY target, while in others (such as high-cost operations – e.g. live Coral Trout, lobster) it may be too low. Using the Queensland east coast otter trawl fisheries as an example and utilising the BDO economic information available for the fishery, undertake a comprehensive bioeconomic analysis to establish a real MEY value. This will combine biological and known economic models to inform the optimal level of fishing to maximise the economic yield for the industry. This will also inform the data needs required to inform MEY estimation for other fisheries and be used as a pilot to improve industries understanding of how achieving MEY in fisheries can maximise their economic value and encourage higher uptake in economic data submission and confidence. |
Deliverables |
|
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 14 February 2022 Outputs are required to inform the review of the harvest strategy in early 2025. |
End user |
|
Jurisdictions |
Queensland |
FRDC Outcome(s) |
Outcome 1: Growth for enduring prosperity. Outcome 2: Best practices and production systems. Outcome 4: Fair and secure access to aquatic resources. Outcome 5: Community trust, respect, and value. |
Other |
Identified in the Trawl Fishery Harvest Strategy as a high priority |
Title |
Developing stock assessment approaches, harvest strategies and biosecurity for seaweeds in southern Australia |
Need |
|
Deliverables |
This project will be the first of its kind in Australia and will enable policy makers with scientific tools for resource management and protection Theme 1. Stock assessment
Theme 2. Biosecurity
|
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 14 February 2022 |
End user |
|
Jurisdictions |
South Australia and other jurisdictions |
FRDC Outcome(s) |
Outcome 1: Growth for enduring prosperity Outcome 2: Best practice & production systems |
Other |
Title |
Developing stock assessment approaches to determine status and set quota for Australian squid fisheries |
Need |
|
Deliverables |
|
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 14 February 2022 |
End user |
|
Jurisdictions |
South Australia |
FRDC Outcome(s) |
Outcome 1: Growth for enduring prosperity Outcome 2: Best practices and production systems |
Other |
Title |
Profile of recreational fishers in Tasmania: understanding experiences, behaviours, drivers, communication needs and change factors |
Need |
This project addresses the need to understand current drivers and emerging trends in behaviours of recreational fishers, inclusive of fishing behaviours as well as visitation, consumption, expenditure, and communication behaviours – all of which determine the benefits and impacts of recreational fishing in Tasmania. These behaviours and their drivers will differ across different segments of recreational fishers in Tasmania (e.g., across different activity groups, such as 'inshore fishers', 'lobster fishers', 'offshore fishers'; or across avid and occasional fishers). Having this knowledge of current behaviours and capacity to model behaviours under changing conditions or management settings of specific segments of the recreational fishing community will help in selecting effective interventions for sustainable fisheries management, and effective ways to work with recreational fishing communities to address collective challenges and improve outcomes for recreational fishers. Understanding recreational fisher segments (profiling) will also enable the sector to actively market to and develop specific parts of the fishery to ensure a long-term approach to sustaining and potentially developing the sector. This would be of particular benefit to fishing and boating retailers, charter boat operators as well as other supporting tourism operators and other ancillary businesses to the sector. This project will involve reviewing available data on fisher preferences and behaviour, including observations of fisher responses to changed availability of recreational opportunities. It will then involve expanding the existing general fishery survey sample frame to undertake broad-base surveys of fishing behaviours (including substitution), preferences, travel patterns, general recreational activities, and other social and psychological indicators to profile the different segments of the recreational fishing community. Question design will be informed by the review of existing work, including findings of the National Social and Economic Survey of Recreational Fishers (FRDC project 2018-161). Profiling will also apply standard segmentation methods used in established frameworks in marketing research (e.g. MOSIAC, helix persona). This will support designing effective social marketing approaches (e.g. nudges) and communication strategies to support sustainable fisheries management. |
Deliverables |
|
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 14 February 2022 |
End user |
|
Jurisdictions |
Tasmania – although potential benefits of method design to other jurisdictions |
R&D Plan Outcome |
Outcome 3: A culture that is inclusive and forward thinking Outcome 4: Fair and secure access to aquatic resources Outcome 5: Community trust, respect, and value |
Other |
Title |
Risk profile for paralytic shellfish toxins in Tasmanian Periwinkles |
Need |
|
Deliverables |
A risk profile for paralytic shellfish toxin in Tasmanian Periwinkles, including:
|
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 14 February 2022 The project would need to start prior to July 2022 (next bloom season) |
End user |
|
Jurisdictions |
Tasmania |
FRDC Outcome(s) |
Outcome 1: Growth for enduring prosperity Outcome 2: Best practices and production systems Outcome 5: Community trust, respect, and value |
Other |
Title |
Minor use permit for oxytetracycline in marine and freshwater crustaceans |
Need |
Oxytetracycline is broadly effective against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Globally, oxytetracycline is widely used in crustacean aquaculture. There are no permitted or registered veterinary chemical products for treating bacterial infections in marine or freshwater crustacean aquaculture. A minor use permit (MUP) for oxytetracycline in Australian crustacean aquaculture would help decrease crustacean morbidity and mortality and improve crustacean welfare and aquaculture production, providing benefit to marine and freshwater crustacean aquaculture industries in Australia. |
Deliverable |
Finalise data package and submit a MUP application to the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) for the use of oxytetracycline products (containing 926 grams per kilogram, g/kg oxytetracycline) to treat susceptible bacterial infections in marine and freshwater crustaceans. Pre-Application Assistance (PAA) written advice for this project has been obtained from the APVMA. In summary, the APVMA have advised that the following data modules are required (apvma.gov.au/node/49261):
Please refer to PAA written advice provided |
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 14 January 2022 |
End user |
|
Jurisdictions |
All jurisdictions |
FRDC Outcome(s) |
Outcome 2: Best practices and production systems. Outcome 4: Fair and secure access to aquatic resources. This project also aligns with Objective 6 of Draft AQUAPLAN 2021-2026: Veterinary medicines. Improved access to veterinary medicines, chemicals and vaccines strengthens management of aquatic animal health and welfare and supports prudent use of antimicrobials and therapeutics. |
Other |
The "Project Budget" provided must be completed and submitted with the application. More information regarding specific Quality, Safety and Efficacy VICH guidelines can be found here: Analytical validation (vichsec.org) This project is linked to FRDC project "2020-094: Improving the availability of safe and effective veterinary medicines for Australia's seafood industry" (https://frdc.com.au/project/2020-094). |
Title |
Minor use permit for toltrazuril in marine and freshwater finfish |
Need |
In Australia, there are no permitted or registered veterinary chemical products to treat internal parasite protozoan infections (e.g., scuticociliates) in marine or freshwater finfish aquaculture. Toltrazuril products have been shown to be effective in treating some protozoan parasite infections in finfish aquaculture (Mehlhorn et al., 1988, Jaafar and Buchmann, 2011; Carraschi et al., 2014). In Australia, the use of toltrazuril containing products is currently regulated off-label by State Governments. A minor use permit (MUP) for products containing toltrazuril would provide treatment options to aquatic veterinarians. Access to this parasite treatment option would help decrease finfish morbidity and mortality and improve finfish welfare and aquaculture production. This project would work to develop a MUP accessible to, and provide benefit to, marine and freshwater finfish aquaculture industries in Australia. References:
|
Deliverable |
Finalise data package and submit a MUP application to the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) for the use of toltrazuril products (containing 50 grams per litre, g/L toltrazuril) to treat susceptible parasites including internal protozoan parasites in marine and freshwater finfish. Pre-Application Assistance (PAA) written advice for this project has been obtained from the APVMA . In summary, the APVMA have advised that the following data modules are required (apvma.gov.au/node/49261):
Please refer to PAA written advice provided |
Timing |
APPLICATIONS CLOSE 14 January 2022 |
End user |
|
Jurisdictions |
All jurisdictions |
FRDC Outcome(s) |
Outcome 2: Best practices and production systems. Outcome 4: Fair and secure access to aquatic resources. This project also aligns with Objective 6 of Draft AQUAPLAN 2021-2026: Veterinary medicines. Improved access to veterinary medicines, chemicals and vaccines strengthens management of aquatic animal health and welfare and supports prudent use of antimicrobials and therapeutics. |
Other |
The "Project Budget" provided must be completed and submitted with the application. More information regarding specific Quality, Safety and Efficacy VICH guidelines can be found here: Analytical validation (vichsec.org) This project is linked to FRDC project "2020-094: Improving the availability of safe and effective veterinary medicines for Australia's seafood industry" (https://frdc.com.au/project/2020-094). |